The seminar gathered practicing lawyers and associates with the main aim to pay their attention at the new judicial practice of legal investigation of bankruptcy cases, new clarifications of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation relating to application of the bankruptcy law – in the context of procedural law changes. Olga Nikitina, The Supreme Arbitration Court advisor (Moscow) reported as one of the speakers invited by Top-Consulting GC.
Profound changes in the bankruptcy laws and preventive measures of the laws errors made by the bankruptcy participants became one of the first key topics raised at the consulting seminar. Olga Alexandrovna told about new peculiarities of the pledgee`s requirements satisfaction in bankruptcy procedures, new norms concerning the arbitration managers, new peculiarities of developer`s inconsistency, regulated by the Federal Law ‘On amendments in the part of stating peculiarities of bankruptcy of the developers, who attract monetary funds of the construction participants’ of 12.07.2011 #210-FZ.
The second topic of the seminar was dedicated to the key changes in the arbitration procedural law, the legal standards of inconsistency (bankruptcy), new requirements towards the bankruptcy cases participants and parties` mistakes, most frequently made in this process.
Sergey Radchenko, Senior associate of Advocates bureau Yug, underlined quite a topical issue as well: reimbursement of the expenses, caused by arbitration managers and administrators` actions. First of all, Sergey Radchenko, an actively practicing associate with rich experience of practical work, explained why the question about the methods and ways for a creditor to use to claim the damages indemnity by an arbitration manager, should be discussed at all. In which case it is reasonable and wise and when it is not, and if it is still reasonable, what is the better approach to calculate the risks and to estimate perspectives. In the process of presentation, Sergey Radchenko considered the issue of what is practically admitted as losses and damages, and under which conditions they can be claimed and indemnified. In conclusion of the report he shared with the audience some procedural points of the damages indemnity.
Mr. Radchenko used a number of examples from his practical experience to prove and argument his speech.
During the whole seminar speakers answered and commented on all the attendants` questions.